| Preview
Subscribers | 2006 |
Escrow Agreement
Escrow Agreement (26K)
Doc #2612592: Click preview link for longer preview.
ESCROW AGREEMENT
This Escrow Agreement (the �Agreement�) dated as of September 8, 2006, among Omega Protein Corporation, a Nevada corporation (�Purchaser�), with an address of 2101 CityWest Boulevard, Building 3, Suite 500, Houston, Texas 77042, Zapata Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the �Seller�), with an address of 100 Meridian Centre, Suite 350, Rochester, New York 14618 and Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company (the �Escrow Agent�). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Purchase Agreement; . . .
2612592
| | |
| Preview
Subscribers | 2003 |
Appendix to SPG Plaintiffs' and Randall J. Smith's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction
Appendix to SPG Plaintiffs' and Randall J. Smith's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (803K)
Doc #256919: Click preview link for longer preview.
{DOCUMENT}
{TYPE}EX-99.(A)(5)(AA)
{SEQUENCE}6
{FILENAME}a2104795zex-99_a5aa.txt
{DESCRIPTION}EXHIBIT 99(A)(5)(AA)
{TEXT}
{Page}
EXHIBIT (a)(5)(AA)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
---------------------------------------x
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC., :
SIMON PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS, INC.,
AND RANDALL J. SMITH, :
Plaintiffs, :
CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-74799
- against - :
The Honorable Victoria A. Roberts
TAUBMAN CENTERS, INC., A. ALFRED :
TAUBMAN, ROBERT S. TAUBMAN, LISA Magistrate Judge Virginia M. Morgan
A. PAYNE, GRAHAM T. ALLISON, PETER :
KARMANOS, JR., WILLIAM S. TAUBMAN,
ALLAN J. BLOOSTEIN, JEROME A. :
CHAZEN, AND S. PARKER GILBERT,
:
Defendants.
:
---------------------------------------x
APPENDIX TO SPG PLAINTIFFS' AND RANDALL J. SMITH'S
MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
VOLUME IV
A1273 - A1550
{Page}
INDEX TO APPENDIX
TO SPG PLAINTIFFS' AND RANDALL J. SMITH'S
MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
VOLUME I: PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
{Table}
{Caption}
Page
{S} {C}
SPG Offer to Purchase for Cash, dated Dec. 5, 2002..............................................Al
SPG and Westfield Supplement to the Offer to Purchase, dated Jan. 15, 2003.....................A56
TCI Schedule 14D-9/A Amendment No. 3, dated Dec. 20, 2002......................................A95
TCI Common Stock Prospectus, dated Nov. 20, 1992 (Defendants' Exhibit 7)......................A158
TCI Articles of Incorporation, dated Aug. 9, 2000 ............................................A348
TCI Second Amendment and Restatement of Agreement of
Limited Partnership, dated Sept. 30, 1998 ..............................................A383
TCI Form 8-K, dated Aug. 18, 1998 (Payne Exhibit 1)...........................................A448
TCI Form 8-K, dated Sept. 30, 1998 (Payne Exhibit 2)..........................................A468
TCI Schedule 14D-9, dated December 11, 2002 (Gilbert Exhibit 10)..............................A486
Press Release, Taubman Centers, Inc., dated Jan. 21, 2003.....................................A512
TCI Schedule 13D/A, dated Nov. 14, 2002.......................................................A516
Press Release, Taubman Centers, Inc., dated Dec. 17, 2002 ....................................A570
TCI Schedule 13D/A, dated Jan. 28, 2003.......................................................A573
{/Table}
{Page}
VOLUME II: DEPOSITION EXHIBITS/DOCUMENTS
{Table}
{Caption}
Page
{S} {C}
NOVA Restructuring and Recapitalization Plan Goldman Sachs as Advisor
to the NOVA Family (Rosenberg Exhibit 7)................................................A600
Project NOVA Goldman Sachs Value Added (Rosenberg Exhibit 8)..................................A602
Memorandum to IBD Innovation Award Committee, dated Nov. 18, 1998
(Rosenberg Exhibit 10) ...................................................................A608
Goldman Sachs Handwritten Notes (Bloostein Exhibit 3) ........................................A610
Separation and Relative Value Adjustment Agreement, dated Aug. 17, 1998.......................A775
REIT Flowchart (Bloostein Exhibit 2)..........................................................A845
Morgan Stanley Handwritten Notes (Niehaus Exhibit 3) .........................................A846
Letter from Morgan Stanley to the Taubman Partnership Committee and Board of
Directors, dated Aug. 17, 1998 (Niehaus Exhibit 8) ......................................A847
Minutes of Meeting of the Partnership Committee of TCI, dated June 24, 1998
(Gilbert Exhibit 3) ......................................................................A850
Project NOVA, Preliminary Transaction Term Sheet Unit Redemption Transaction,
revised June 29, 1998 ....................................................................A854
1998 Draft Press Releases (Taubman Exhibit 12) ...............................................A861
TCI Ownership Structure, May 2001 Proxy (Rosenberg Exhibit 5) ................................A912
Letter from Goldman Sachs to R. Taubman, dated Oct. 25, 2002 (R. Taubman Exhibit 9) ..........A914
Minutes of a Special Meeting of the Board of Directors of TCI,
dated Oct. 28, 2002 (Rosenberg Exhibit 1) ................................................A923
Voting Agreements, dated Nov. 14, 2002 (R. Taubman Exhibit 13) ...............................A928
Letter from D. Simon to R. Taubman, dated Oct. 22, 2002 (Bloostein Exhibit 4) ................A935
{/Table}
{Page}
VOLUME III: DEPOSITION TESTIMONY/CASES & AUTHORITIES
{Table}
{Caption}
Page
{S} {C}
Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Allan J. Bloostein, taken Jan. 14, 2003 ...........A938
Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Simon Parker Gilbert, taken Jan. 9, 2003 ..........A984
Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of G. William Miller, taken Jan. 22, 2003............A1030
Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Lisa Payne, taken Jan. 17, 2003 ..................A1037
256919
|
Zapata
As referenced in this Appendix to SPG Plaintiffs' and Randall J. Smith's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction:
Zapata Corp. – 16 DEL. J. CORP. L. 1425, **1442)
burden.
Once a plaintiff has alleged facts to establish that demand is excused, the
corporation is required to meet the different test of Zapata Corp. v. Maldonado
before it can prevail on an argument that the suit should be dismissed.
Del.Supr., 430 A.2d 779 (1981); Allison on Behalf of G.M.C.
_____________
dt 1330573
;
CTS
As referenced in this Appendix to SPG Plaintiffs' and Randall J. Smith's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction:
CTS CORP – s authority to enact the corporate governance rules established by
the Control Share Acquisitions Chapter was affirmed by The the United States
Sureme Court in the land mark case of CTS CORP U DYNAMICS CORP. OF AMERICA,
481 U.S. (69) 95 L. Ed 2d 67 (1987). In CTS both the Federal District Court
SEE 637 F.Supp.389 (N.D. Ill.
_____________
CTS CORP. – 1-42-2) that, when added to the acquiring person's pre-acquisition holdings,
put the person over one of the three specified thresholds of voting power. The
facts in CTS CORP. V. DYNAMICS CORP. OF AMERICA, 481 U.S. (69), 95 L. Ed. 2d 67
(1987), are illustrative. The acquiring person in CTS owned approximately 9.6%
of the issuing
_____________
CTS Corp. – Williams Act, 15 U.S.C. Sections 78m(d)-(e), 78n(d)M, nor in violation of the
commerce clause of the federal Constitution, Art. I, Section 8, cl. 3. CTS Corp.
v. Dynamics Corp. of Am., 481 U.S. 69, 107 S. Ct. 1637, 95 L. Ed. 2d 67 (1987).
COLLATERAL REFERENCES. "Golden parachute" defense to hostile corporate
takeover. 66
_____________
CTS Corp. – Virginia Bankshares, Inc., 891 F.2d 1112, 1122 (4th Cir.1989), cert. accepted on
other grounds, 58 U.S.L.W. 3677 (April 23, 1990); Dynamics Corp. of America v.
CTS Corp. , 805 F.2d 705, 710-11, 716 (7th Cir.1986); Berkman v. Rust Craft
Greeting Cards, Inc., 454 F.Supp. 787, 791-92 (S.D.N.Y.1978); accord
_____________
dt 1463698
;
|
Jack in the Box
As referenced in this Appendix to SPG Plaintiffs' and Randall J. Smith's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction:
JACK IN THE BOX, INC. – in
determining when an initial pleading triggers removal. Id. Some courts hold
that Chapman requires a specific dollar allegation to begin the 30-day
removal period, e.g., BELL V. JACK IN THE BOX, INC. , 2000 US. DIST. LEXIS
1595, 2000 WL 140769 (N.D. Tex. Feb. 7, 2000), but other courts doubt that
Chapman was meant to be read so narrowly, e.g.,
_____________
dt 1506083
;
More... |
| Preview
Subscribers | 2003 |
Appendix to SPG Plaintiffs' and Randall J. Smith's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction
Appendix to SPG Plaintiffs' and Randall J. Smith's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (803K)
Doc #256924: Click preview link for longer preview.
{DOCUMENT}
{TYPE}EX-99.A5AA
{SEQUENCE}6
{FILENAME}a2104711zex-99_a5aa.txt
{DESCRIPTION}EXHIBIT 99(A)(5)(AA)
{TEXT}
{Page}
EXHIBIT (a)(5)(AA)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
---------------------------------------x
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC., :
SIMON PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS, INC.,
AND RANDALL J. SMITH, :
Plaintiffs, :
CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-74799
- against - :
The Honorable Victoria A. Roberts
TAUBMAN CENTERS, INC., A. ALFRED :
TAUBMAN, ROBERT S. TAUBMAN, LISA Magistrate Judge Virginia M. Morgan
A. PAYNE, GRAHAM T. ALLISON, PETER :
KARMANOS, JR., WILLIAM S. TAUBMAN,
ALLAN J. BLOOSTEIN, JEROME A. :
CHAZEN, AND S. PARKER GILBERT,
:
Defendants.
:
---------------------------------------x
APPENDIX TO SPG PLAINTIFFS' AND RANDALL J. SMITH'S
MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
VOLUME IV
A1273 - A1550
{Page}
INDEX TO APPENDIX
TO SPG PLAINTIFFS' AND RANDALL J. SMITH'S
MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
VOLUME I: PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
{Table}
{Caption}
Page
{S} {C}
SPG Offer to Purchase for Cash, dated Dec. 5, 2002..............................................Al
SPG and Westfield Supplement to the Offer to Purchase, dated Jan. 15, 2003.....................A56
TCI Schedule 14D-9/A Amendment No. 3, dated Dec. 20, 2002......................................A95
TCI Common Stock Prospectus, dated Nov. 20, 1992 (Defendants' Exhibit 7)......................A158
TCI Articles of Incorporation, dated Aug. 9, 2000 ............................................A348
TCI Second Amendment and Restatement of Agreement of
Limited Partnership, dated Sept. 30, 1998 ..............................................A383
TCI Form 8-K, dated Aug. 18, 1998 (Payne Exhibit 1)...........................................A448
TCI Form 8-K, dated Sept. 30, 1998 (Payne Exhibit 2)..........................................A468
TCI Schedule 14D-9, dated December 11, 2002 (Gilbert Exhibit 10)..............................A486
Press Release, Taubman Centers, Inc., dated Jan. 21, 2003.....................................A512
TCI Schedule 13D/A, dated Nov. 14, 2002.......................................................A516
Press Release, Taubman Centers, Inc., dated Dec. 17, 2002 ....................................A570
TCI Schedule 13D/A, dated Jan. 28, 2003.......................................................A573
{/Table}
{Page}
VOLUME II: DEPOSITION EXHIBITS/DOCUMENTS
{Table}
{Caption}
Page
{S} {C}
NOVA Restructuring and Recapitalization Plan Goldman Sachs as Advisor
to the NOVA Family (Rosenberg Exhibit 7)................................................A600
Project NOVA Goldman Sachs Value Added (Rosenberg Exhibit 8)..................................A602
Memorandum to IBD Innovation Award Committee, dated Nov. 18, 1998
(Rosenberg Exhibit 10) ...................................................................A608
Goldman Sachs Handwritten Notes (Bloostein Exhibit 3) ........................................A610
Separation and Relative Value Adjustment Agreement, dated Aug. 17, 1998.......................A775
REIT Flowchart (Bloostein Exhibit 2)..........................................................A845
Morgan Stanley Handwritten Notes (Niehaus Exhibit 3) .........................................A846
Letter from Morgan Stanley to the Taubman Partnership Committee and Board of
Directors, dated Aug. 17, 1998 (Niehaus Exhibit 8) ......................................A847
Minutes of Meeting of the Partnership Committee of TCI, dated June 24, 1998
(Gilbert Exhibit 3) ......................................................................A850
Project NOVA, Preliminary Transaction Term Sheet Unit Redemption Transaction,
revised June 29, 1998 ....................................................................A854
1998 Draft Press Releases (Taubman Exhibit 12) ...............................................A861
TCI Ownership Structure, May 2001 Proxy (Rosenberg Exhibit 5) ................................A912
Letter from Goldman Sachs to R. Taubman, dated Oct. 25, 2002 (R. Taubman Exhibit 9) ..........A914
Minutes of a Special Meeting of the Board of Directors of TCI,
dated Oct. 28, 2002 (Rosenberg Exhibit 1) ................................................A923
Voting Agreements, dated Nov. 14, 2002 (R. Taubman Exhibit 13) ...............................A928
Letter from D. Simon to R. Taubman, dated Oct. 22, 2002 (Bloostein Exhibit 4) ................A935
{/Table}
{Page}
VOLUME III: DEPOSITION TESTIMONY/CASES & AUTHORITIES
{Table}
{Caption}
Page
{S} {C}
Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Allan J. Bloostein, taken Jan. 14, 2003 ...........A938
Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Simon Parker Gilbert, taken Jan. 9, 2003 ..........A984
Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of G. William Miller, taken Jan. 22, 2003............A1030
Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Lisa Payne, taken Jan. 17, 2003 ..................A1037
256924
|
Zapata
As referenced in this Appendix to SPG Plaintiffs' and Randall J. Smith's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction:
Zapata Corp. – 16 DEL. J. CORP. L. 1425, **1442)
burden.
Once a plaintiff has alleged facts to establish that demand is excused, the
corporation is required to meet the different test of Zapata Corp. v. Maldonado
before it can prevail on an argument that the suit should be dismissed.
Del.Supr., 430 A.2d 779 (1981); Allison on Behalf of G.M.C.
_____________
dt 1330574
;
CTS
As referenced in this Appendix to SPG Plaintiffs' and Randall J. Smith's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction:
CTS CORP – s authority to enact the corporate governance rules established by
the Control Share Acquisitions Chapter was affirmed by The the United States
Sureme Court in the land mark case of CTS CORP U DYNAMICS CORP. OF AMERICA,
481 U.S. (69) 95 L. Ed 2d 67 (1987). In CTS both the Federal District Court
SEE 637 F.Supp.389 (N.D. Ill.
_____________
CTS CORP. – 1-42-2) that, when added to the acquiring person's pre-acquisition holdings,
put the person over one of the three specified thresholds of voting power. The
facts in CTS CORP. V. DYNAMICS CORP. OF AMERICA, 481 U.S. (69), 95 L. Ed. 2d 67
(1987), are illustrative. The acquiring person in CTS owned approximately 9.6%
of the issuing
_____________
CTS Corp. – Williams Act, 15 U.S.C. Sections 78m(d)-(e), 78n(d)M, nor in violation of the
commerce clause of the federal Constitution, Art. I, Section 8, cl. 3. CTS Corp.
v. Dynamics Corp. of Am., 481 U.S. 69, 107 S. Ct. 1637, 95 L. Ed. 2d 67 (1987).
COLLATERAL REFERENCES. "Golden parachute" defense to hostile corporate
takeover. 66
_____________
CTS Corp. – Virginia Bankshares, Inc., 891 F.2d 1112, 1122 (4th Cir.1989), cert. accepted on
other grounds, 58 U.S.L.W. 3677 (April 23, 1990); Dynamics Corp. of America v.
CTS Corp. , 805 F.2d 705, 710-11, 716 (7th Cir.1986); Berkman v. Rust Craft
Greeting Cards, Inc., 454 F.Supp. 787, 791-92 (S.D.N.Y.1978); accord
_____________
dt 1463699
;
|
Jack in the Box
As referenced in this Appendix to SPG Plaintiffs' and Randall J. Smith's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction:
JACK IN THE BOX, INC. – in
determining when an initial pleading triggers removal. Id. Some courts hold
that Chapman requires a specific dollar allegation to begin the 30-day
removal period, e.g., BELL V. JACK IN THE BOX, INC. , 2000 US. DIST. LEXIS
1595, 2000 WL 140769 (N.D. Tex. Feb. 7, 2000), but other courts doubt that
Chapman was meant to be read so narrowly, e.g.,
_____________
dt 1506084
;
More... |
| Preview
Subscribers | 2003 |
Appendix to SPG Plaintiffs' and Randall J. Smith's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction
Appendix to SPG Plaintiffs' and Randall J. Smith's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (803K)
Doc #258133: Click preview link for longer preview.
{DOCUMENT}
{TYPE}EX-99.(A)(5)(AA)
{SEQUENCE}6
{FILENAME}a2104795zex-99_a5aa.txt
{DESCRIPTION}EXHIBIT 99(A)(5)(AA)
{TEXT}
{Page}
EXHIBIT (a)(5)(AA)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
---------------------------------------x
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC., :
SIMON PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS, INC.,
AND RANDALL J. SMITH, :
Plaintiffs, :
CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-74799
- against - :
The Honorable Victoria A. Roberts
TAUBMAN CENTERS, INC., A. ALFRED :
TAUBMAN, ROBERT S. TAUBMAN, LISA Magistrate Judge Virginia M. Morgan
A. PAYNE, GRAHAM T. ALLISON, PETER :
KARMANOS, JR., WILLIAM S. TAUBMAN,
ALLAN J. BLOOSTEIN, JEROME A. :
CHAZEN, AND S. PARKER GILBERT,
:
Defendants.
:
---------------------------------------x
APPENDIX TO SPG PLAINTIFFS' AND RANDALL J. SMITH'S
MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
VOLUME IV
A1273 - A1550
{Page}
INDEX TO APPENDIX
TO SPG PLAINTIFFS' AND RANDALL J. SMITH'S
MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
VOLUME I: PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
{Table}
{Caption}
Page
{S} {C}
SPG Offer to Purchase for Cash, dated Dec. 5, 2002..............................................Al
SPG and Westfield Supplement to the Offer to Purchase, dated Jan. 15, 2003.....................A56
TCI Schedule 14D-9/A Amendment No. 3, dated Dec. 20, 2002......................................A95
TCI Common Stock Prospectus, dated Nov. 20, 1992 (Defendants' Exhibit 7)......................A158
TCI Articles of Incorporation, dated Aug. 9, 2000 ............................................A348
TCI Second Amendment and Restatement of Agreement of
Limited Partnership, dated Sept. 30, 1998 ..............................................A383
TCI Form 8-K, dated Aug. 18, 1998 (Payne Exhibit 1)...........................................A448
TCI Form 8-K, dated Sept. 30, 1998 (Payne Exhibit 2)..........................................A468
TCI Schedule 14D-9, dated December 11, 2002 (Gilbert Exhibit 10)..............................A486
Press Release, Taubman Centers, Inc., dated Jan. 21, 2003.....................................A512
TCI Schedule 13D/A, dated Nov. 14, 2002.......................................................A516
Press Release, Taubman Centers, Inc., dated Dec. 17, 2002 ....................................A570
TCI Schedule 13D/A, dated Jan. 28, 2003.......................................................A573
{/Table}
{Page}
VOLUME II: DEPOSITION EXHIBITS/DOCUMENTS
{Table}
{Caption}
Page
{S} {C}
NOVA Restructuring and Recapitalization Plan Goldman Sachs as Advisor
to the NOVA Family (Rosenberg Exhibit 7)................................................A600
Project NOVA Goldman Sachs Value Added (Rosenberg Exhibit 8)..................................A602
Memorandum to IBD Innovation Award Committee, dated Nov. 18, 1998
(Rosenberg Exhibit 10) ...................................................................A608
Goldman Sachs Handwritten Notes (Bloostein Exhibit 3) ........................................A610
Separation and Relative Value Adjustment Agreement, dated Aug. 17, 1998.......................A775
REIT Flowchart (Bloostein Exhibit 2)..........................................................A845
Morgan Stanley Handwritten Notes (Niehaus Exhibit 3) .........................................A846
Letter from Morgan Stanley to the Taubman Partnership Committee and Board of
Directors, dated Aug. 17, 1998 (Niehaus Exhibit 8) ......................................A847
Minutes of Meeting of the Partnership Committee of TCI, dated June 24, 1998
(Gilbert Exhibit 3) ......................................................................A850
Project NOVA, Preliminary Transaction Term Sheet Unit Redemption Transaction,
revised June 29, 1998 ....................................................................A854
1998 Draft Press Releases (Taubman Exhibit 12) ...............................................A861
TCI Ownership Structure, May 2001 Proxy (Rosenberg Exhibit 5) ................................A912
Letter from Goldman Sachs to R. Taubman, dated Oct. 25, 2002 (R. Taubman Exhibit 9) ..........A914
Minutes of a Special Meeting of the Board of Directors of TCI,
dated Oct. 28, 2002 (Rosenberg Exhibit 1) ................................................A923
Voting Agreements, dated Nov. 14, 2002 (R. Taubman Exhibit 13) ...............................A928
Letter from D. Simon to R. Taubman, dated Oct. 22, 2002 (Bloostein Exhibit 4) ................A935
{/Table}
{Page}
VOLUME III: DEPOSITION TESTIMONY/CASES & AUTHORITIES
{Table}
{Caption}
Page
{S} {C}
Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Allan J. Bloostein, taken Jan. 14, 2003 ...........A938
Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Simon Parker Gilbert, taken Jan. 9, 2003 ..........A984
Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of G. William Miller, taken Jan. 22, 2003............A1030
Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Lisa Payne, taken Jan. 17, 2003 ..................A1037
258133
|
Zapata
As referenced in this Appendix to SPG Plaintiffs' and Randall J. Smith's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction:
Zapata Corp. – 16 DEL. J. CORP. L. 1425, **1442)
burden.
Once a plaintiff has alleged facts to establish that demand is excused, the
corporation is required to meet the different test of Zapata Corp. v. Maldonado
before it can prevail on an argument that the suit should be dismissed.
Del.Supr., 430 A.2d 779 (1981); Allison on Behalf of G.M.C.
_____________
dt 1330575
;
CTS
As referenced in this Appendix to SPG Plaintiffs' and Randall J. Smith's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction:
CTS CORP – s authority to enact the corporate governance rules established by
the Control Share Acquisitions Chapter was affirmed by The the United States
Sureme Court in the land mark case of CTS CORP U DYNAMICS CORP. OF AMERICA,
481 U.S. (69) 95 L. Ed 2d 67 (1987). In CTS both the Federal District Court
SEE 637 F.Supp.389 (N.D. Ill.
_____________
CTS CORP. – 1-42-2) that, when added to the acquiring person's pre-acquisition holdings,
put the person over one of the three specified thresholds of voting power. The
facts in CTS CORP. V. DYNAMICS CORP. OF AMERICA, 481 U.S. (69), 95 L. Ed. 2d 67
(1987), are illustrative. The acquiring person in CTS owned approximately 9.6%
of the issuing
_____________
CTS Corp. – Williams Act, 15 U.S.C. Sections 78m(d)-(e), 78n(d)M, nor in violation of the
commerce clause of the federal Constitution, Art. I, Section 8, cl. 3. CTS Corp.
v. Dynamics Corp. of Am., 481 U.S. 69, 107 S. Ct. 1637, 95 L. Ed. 2d 67 (1987).
COLLATERAL REFERENCES. "Golden parachute" defense to hostile corporate
takeover. 66
_____________
CTS Corp. – Virginia Bankshares, Inc., 891 F.2d 1112, 1122 (4th Cir.1989), cert. accepted on
other grounds, 58 U.S.L.W. 3677 (April 23, 1990); Dynamics Corp. of America v.
CTS Corp. , 805 F.2d 705, 710-11, 716 (7th Cir.1986); Berkman v. Rust Craft
Greeting Cards, Inc., 454 F.Supp. 787, 791-92 (S.D.N.Y.1978); accord
_____________
dt 1463706
;
|
Jack in the Box
As referenced in this Appendix to SPG Plaintiffs' and Randall J. Smith's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction:
JACK IN THE BOX, INC. – in
determining when an initial pleading triggers removal. Id. Some courts hold
that Chapman requires a specific dollar allegation to begin the 30-day
removal period, e.g., BELL V. JACK IN THE BOX, INC. , 2000 US. DIST. LEXIS
1595, 2000 WL 140769 (N.D. Tex. Feb. 7, 2000), but other courts doubt that
Chapman was meant to be read so narrowly, e.g.,
_____________
dt 1506085
;
More... |
| Preview
Subscribers | 2003 |
Appendix to SPG Plaintiffs' and Randall J. Smith's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction
Appendix to SPG Plaintiffs' and Randall J. Smith's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (803K)
Doc #258141: Click preview link for longer preview.
{DOCUMENT}
{TYPE}EX-99.A5AA
{SEQUENCE}6
{FILENAME}a2104711zex-99_a5aa.txt
{DESCRIPTION}EXHIBIT 99(A)(5)(AA)
{TEXT}
{Page}
EXHIBIT (a)(5)(AA)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
---------------------------------------x
SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC., :
SIMON PROPERTY ACQUISITIONS, INC.,
AND RANDALL J. SMITH, :
Plaintiffs, :
CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-74799
- against - :
The Honorable Victoria A. Roberts
TAUBMAN CENTERS, INC., A. ALFRED :
TAUBMAN, ROBERT S. TAUBMAN, LISA Magistrate Judge Virginia M. Morgan
A. PAYNE, GRAHAM T. ALLISON, PETER :
KARMANOS, JR., WILLIAM S. TAUBMAN,
ALLAN J. BLOOSTEIN, JEROME A. :
CHAZEN, AND S. PARKER GILBERT,
:
Defendants.
:
---------------------------------------x
APPENDIX TO SPG PLAINTIFFS' AND RANDALL J. SMITH'S
MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
VOLUME IV
A1273 - A1550
{Page}
INDEX TO APPENDIX
TO SPG PLAINTIFFS' AND RANDALL J. SMITH'S
MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
VOLUME I: PUBLIC DOCUMENTS
{Table}
{Caption}
Page
{S} {C}
SPG Offer to Purchase for Cash, dated Dec. 5, 2002..............................................Al
SPG and Westfield Supplement to the Offer to Purchase, dated Jan. 15, 2003.....................A56
TCI Schedule 14D-9/A Amendment No. 3, dated Dec. 20, 2002......................................A95
TCI Common Stock Prospectus, dated Nov. 20, 1992 (Defendants' Exhibit 7)......................A158
TCI Articles of Incorporation, dated Aug. 9, 2000 ............................................A348
TCI Second Amendment and Restatement of Agreement of
Limited Partnership, dated Sept. 30, 1998 ..............................................A383
TCI Form 8-K, dated Aug. 18, 1998 (Payne Exhibit 1)...........................................A448
TCI Form 8-K, dated Sept. 30, 1998 (Payne Exhibit 2)..........................................A468
TCI Schedule 14D-9, dated December 11, 2002 (Gilbert Exhibit 10)..............................A486
Press Release, Taubman Centers, Inc., dated Jan. 21, 2003.....................................A512
TCI Schedule 13D/A, dated Nov. 14, 2002.......................................................A516
Press Release, Taubman Centers, Inc., dated Dec. 17, 2002 ....................................A570
TCI Schedule 13D/A, dated Jan. 28, 2003.......................................................A573
{/Table}
{Page}
VOLUME II: DEPOSITION EXHIBITS/DOCUMENTS
{Table}
{Caption}
Page
{S} {C}
NOVA Restructuring and Recapitalization Plan Goldman Sachs as Advisor
to the NOVA Family (Rosenberg Exhibit 7)................................................A600
Project NOVA Goldman Sachs Value Added (Rosenberg Exhibit 8)..................................A602
Memorandum to IBD Innovation Award Committee, dated Nov. 18, 1998
(Rosenberg Exhibit 10) ...................................................................A608
Goldman Sachs Handwritten Notes (Bloostein Exhibit 3) ........................................A610
Separation and Relative Value Adjustment Agreement, dated Aug. 17, 1998.......................A775
REIT Flowchart (Bloostein Exhibit 2)..........................................................A845
Morgan Stanley Handwritten Notes (Niehaus Exhibit 3) .........................................A846
Letter from Morgan Stanley to the Taubman Partnership Committee and Board of
Directors, dated Aug. 17, 1998 (Niehaus Exhibit 8) ......................................A847
Minutes of Meeting of the Partnership Committee of TCI, dated June 24, 1998
(Gilbert Exhibit 3) ......................................................................A850
Project NOVA, Preliminary Transaction Term Sheet Unit Redemption Transaction,
revised June 29, 1998 ....................................................................A854
1998 Draft Press Releases (Taubman Exhibit 12) ...............................................A861
TCI Ownership Structure, May 2001 Proxy (Rosenberg Exhibit 5) ................................A912
Letter from Goldman Sachs to R. Taubman, dated Oct. 25, 2002 (R. Taubman Exhibit 9) ..........A914
Minutes of a Special Meeting of the Board of Directors of TCI,
dated Oct. 28, 2002 (Rosenberg Exhibit 1) ................................................A923
Voting Agreements, dated Nov. 14, 2002 (R. Taubman Exhibit 13) ...............................A928
Letter from D. Simon to R. Taubman, dated Oct. 22, 2002 (Bloostein Exhibit 4) ................A935
{/Table}
{Page}
VOLUME III: DEPOSITION TESTIMONY/CASES & AUTHORITIES
{Table}
{Caption}
Page
{S} {C}
Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Allan J. Bloostein, taken Jan. 14, 2003 ...........A938
Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Simon Parker Gilbert, taken Jan. 9, 2003 ..........A984
Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of G. William Miller, taken Jan. 22, 2003............A1030
Excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Lisa Payne, taken Jan. 17, 2003 ..................A1037
258141
|
Zapata
As referenced in this Appendix to SPG Plaintiffs' and Randall J. Smith's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction:
Zapata Corp. – 16 DEL. J. CORP. L. 1425, **1442)
burden.
Once a plaintiff has alleged facts to establish that demand is excused, the
corporation is required to meet the different test of Zapata Corp. v. Maldonado
before it can prevail on an argument that the suit should be dismissed.
Del.Supr., 430 A.2d 779 (1981); Allison on Behalf of G.M.C.
_____________
dt 1330576
;
CTS
As referenced in this Appendix to SPG Plaintiffs' and Randall J. Smith's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction:
CTS CORP – s authority to enact the corporate governance rules established by
the Control Share Acquisitions Chapter was affirmed by The the United States
Sureme Court in the land mark case of CTS CORP U DYNAMICS CORP. OF AMERICA,
481 U.S. (69) 95 L. Ed 2d 67 (1987). In CTS both the Federal District Court
SEE 637 F.Supp.389 (N.D. Ill.
_____________
CTS CORP. – 1-42-2) that, when added to the acquiring person's pre-acquisition holdings,
put the person over one of the three specified thresholds of voting power. The
facts in CTS CORP. V. DYNAMICS CORP. OF AMERICA, 481 U.S. (69), 95 L. Ed. 2d 67
(1987), are illustrative. The acquiring person in CTS owned approximately 9.6%
of the issuing
_____________
CTS Corp. – Williams Act, 15 U.S.C. Sections 78m(d)-(e), 78n(d)M, nor in violation of the
commerce clause of the federal Constitution, Art. I, Section 8, cl. 3. CTS Corp.
v. Dynamics Corp. of Am., 481 U.S. 69, 107 S. Ct. 1637, 95 L. Ed. 2d 67 (1987).
COLLATERAL REFERENCES. "Golden parachute" defense to hostile corporate
takeover. 66
_____________
CTS Corp. – Virginia Bankshares, Inc., 891 F.2d 1112, 1122 (4th Cir.1989), cert. accepted on
other grounds, 58 U.S.L.W. 3677 (April 23, 1990); Dynamics Corp. of America v.
CTS Corp. , 805 F.2d 705, 710-11, 716 (7th Cir.1986); Berkman v. Rust Craft
Greeting Cards, Inc., 454 F.Supp. 787, 791-92 (S.D.N.Y.1978); accord
_____________
dt 1463707
;
|
Emerson Radio
As referenced in this Appendix to SPG Plaintiffs' and Randall J. Smith's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction:
EMERSON RADIO CORP – 1990 WL 161909
(Del. Ch. Oct. 24, 1990) ..............................................................A1423
CLARK V. SAKOWSKI, No. 210508, 2000 WL 33405937
(Mich. App. Oct. 13, 2000.) ...........................................................A1432
EMERSON RADIO CORP . V. INT'L JENSEN INC., Civ. A. Nos. 15130, 14992,
1996 WL 483086 (Del. Ch. Aug. 15, 1996) ...............................................A1436
FDIC V. HYDE
_____________
EMERSON RADIO CORP – Flag }
Only the Westlaw citation is currently available.
UNPUBLISHED OPINION. CHECK COURT RULES BEFORE
CITING.
Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle
County.
EMERSON RADIO CORP ., A DELAWARE
CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
V.
INTERNATIONAL JENSEN
INCORPORATED, A DELAWARE
CORPORATION, ROBERT G. SHAW,
DAVID G. CHANDLER, DONALD W. JENKINS,
ROBERT H.
_____________
Emerson Radio Corp – and Michael L. Vild of Bayard,
Handelman & Murdoch, P.A., Wilmington; and Jeffrey M. Davis of Wolff & Samson,
Roseland, New Jersey, for Plaintiff Emerson Radio Corp .
Wayne N. Elliott, Michael Hanrahan, and Bruce E. Jameson of Prickett,
Jones, Elliott, Kristol & Schnee, Wilmington; Norman M. Monhait of Rosenthal,
Monhait,
_____________
Emerson Radio Corp – Thies and Michael R.
Diocktermann of Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon, Chicago, Illinois, for
Defendant Robert G. Shaw.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JACOBS, Vice Chancellor.
*1 Emerson Radio Corp oration ("Emerson") and a class of shareholders (the
"Shareholder Plaintiffs") of International Jensen Incorporated ("Jensen") seek a
preliminary injunction against a proposed merger
_____________
dt 221365
;
More... |
| Preview
Subscribers | 2006 |
Stock Purchase Agreement
Stock Purchase Agreement (118K)
Doc #2509528: Click preview link for longer preview.
EXECUTION VERSION
STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT
by and between
ZAPATA CORPORATION
and
OMEGA PROTEIN CORPORATION
Dated as of September 8, 2006
2509528
|
Citibank
As referenced in this Stock Purchase Agreement:
Citibank, N.A. – fees and expenses) in connection with such suit and any appeal relating thereto, together with interest on the amounts set forth in Section 10.3 at the prime rate of Citibank, N.A. in effect on the date such payment was required to be made, (b) the Purchaser fails promptly to pay or cause to be paid the amounts due pursuant to
_____________
Citibank, N.A. – fees and expenses) in connection with such suit and any appeal relating thereto, together with interest on the amounts set forth in Section 10.4 at the prime rate of Citibank, N.A. in effect on the date such payment was required to be made.
27
Table of Contents
ARTICLE 11
SURVIVAL; INDEMNIFICATION
SECTION 11.1 Survival.
SECTION 11.1 Survival. The
_____________
dt 1616583
;
|
 Ableco Finance
As referenced in this Stock Purchase Agreement:
Ableco Finance LLC – Call Option Transaction has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 9.2.
2
Table of Contents
Cerberus Commitment Letter means the commitment letter dated September 8, 2006 from Ableco Finance LLC , an affiliate of Cerberus Capital Management, L.P., to provide debt financing (the Financing) for (i) acquiring the Shares, (ii) providing future working capital and (iii) paying fees and
_____________
Ableco Finance LLC – Letter in Section 1.1.
Financing Transaction Documents means the definitive agreements, notes, instruments and other documents to be executed by the Purchaser and/or any of its subsidiaries and Ableco Finance LLC , with respect to which the Financing is be provided to the Purchaser.
Governmental Authority means any federal, state or local government, or any political subdivision of any of the
_____________
Ableco Finance LLC – without notice,
14
Table of Contents
lapse of time or both, would constitute a default or breach on the part of the Purchaser or, to the knowledge of the Purchaser, Ableco Finance LLC , under the Cerberus Commitment Letter. The Purchaser has no reason to believe that any of the conditions to the Financing contemplated by the Cerberus Commitment Letter will not be
_____________
dt 1642380
;
Citibank
As referenced in this Stock Purchase Agreement:
Citibank, N.A. – fees and expenses) in connection with such suit and any appeal relating thereto, together with interest on the amounts set forth in Section 10.3 at the prime rate of Citibank, N.A. in effect on the date such payment was required to be made, (b) the Purchaser fails promptly to pay or cause to be paid the amounts due pursuant to
_____________
Citibank, N.A. – fees and expenses) in connection with such suit and any appeal relating thereto, together with interest on the amounts set forth in Section 10.4 at the prime rate of Citibank, N.A. in effect on the date such payment was required to be made.
27
Table of Contents
ARTICLE 11
SURVIVAL; INDEMNIFICATION
SECTION 11.1 Survival.
SECTION 11.1 Survival. The
_____________
dt 1616583
|